if you need more than one keyword, modify and separate by underscore _
the list of search keywords can be up to 50 characters long
if you modify the keywords, press enter within the field to confirm the new search key
Tag: checklists
Bibliography items where occurs: 31
- The Different Faces of AI Ethics Across the World: A Principle-Implementation Gap Analysis / 2206.03225 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.03225 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 1 Introduction
3 Study Methodology
5 Evaluation of Ethical Principle Implementations
6 Gap Mitigation - ESR: Ethics and Society Review of Artificial Intelligence Research / 2106.11521 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.11521 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 1 Introduction
2 Related Work
References - What does it mean to be a responsible AI practitioner: An ontology of roles and skills / 2205.03946 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.03946 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 1 Introduction
References - Collect, Measure, Repeat: Reliability Factors for Responsible AI Data Collection / 2308.12885 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.12885 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 1 Introduction
- The AI Incident Database as an Educational Tool to Raise Awareness of AI Harms: A Classroom Exploration of Efficacy, Limitations, & Future Improvements / 2310.06269 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.06269 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 1 Introduction
References - Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and Engineering / 2209.04963 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.04963 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 1 Introduction
4 Process Patterns
6 Related Work - Assessing AI Impact Assessments: A Classroom Study / 2311.11193 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.11193 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 4 Findings
- Responsible AI Research Needs Impact Statements Too / 2311.11776 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.11776 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- Abstract
What do RAI venues do? - Understanding Teacher Perspectives and Experiences after Deployment of AI Literacy Curriculum in Middle-school Classrooms / 2312.04839 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.04839 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 3 Results
- AI Ethics Principles in Practice: Perspectives of Designers and Developers / 2112.07467 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.07467 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- II. Related work
V. Discussion and suggestions - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making / 2401.08691 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.08691 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 8 Fairview: an evaluative AI support for addressing fairness
Bibliography - Enabling Global Image Data Sharing in the Life Sciences / 2401.13023 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.13023 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 2. Background
References - Beyond principlism: Practical strategies for ethical AI use in research practices / 2401.15284 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.15284 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 3 Five specific goals and action-guiding strategies for ethical AI use in research practices
4 Concluding remarks - A Scoping Study of Evaluation Practices for Responsible AI Tools: Steps Towards Effectiveness Evaluations / 2401.17486 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.17486 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 2 Related work
References - POLARIS: A framework to guide the development of Trustworthy AI systems / 2402.05340 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.05340 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 3 State of the practice
- Ethics in AI through the Practitioner's View: A Grounded Theory Literature Review / 2206.09514 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.09514 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- A List of Included Studies
- Generative Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Ethical Considerations and Assessment Checklist / 2311.02107 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.02107 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- Methods
Discussion
Reference - Inadequacies of Large Language Model Benchmarks in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence / 2402.09880 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.09880 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- III. Unified Evaluation Framework For LLM
Benchmarks
- Responsible Artificial Intelligence: A Structured Literature Review / 2403.06910 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.06910 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 3. Analysis
- Power and Play Investigating License to Critique in Teams AI Ethics Discussions / 2403.19049 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.19049 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- Abstract
1 Introduction and Related Work
5 Discussion
6 Conclusion
References - Epistemic Power in AI Ethics Labor: Legitimizing Located Complaints / 2402.08171 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658973 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 3 Automated Model Cards:
Legitimacy via Quantified
Objectivity
References - AI Procurement Checklists: Revisiting Implementation in the Age of AI Governance / 2404.14660 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.14660 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- Abstract
1 Technical assessments require an AI expert to complete — and we don’t have enough experts
2 Procurement Loopholes Exist
3 Substantive and Procedural Transparency are Necessary for Deploying Effective and Ethical AI systems
4 Building Towards Better Governance of Government AI - RAI Guidelines: Method for Generating Responsible AI Guidelines Grounded in Regulations and Usable by (Non-)Technical Roles / 2307.15158 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.15158 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 1 Introduction
4 Method for Generating Responsible AI Guidelines
References - Promoting Fairness and Diversity in Speech Datasets for Mental Health and Neurological Disorders Research / 2406.04116 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.04116 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 3. Related Work
- Documenting Ethical Considerations in Open Source AI Models / 2406.18071 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.18071 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 5 DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS
- Challenges and Best Practices in Corporate AI Governance:Lessons from the Biopharmaceutical Industry / 2407.05339 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.05339 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 3 Practical implementation challenges | What to be prepared for?
- Operationalising AI governance through ethics-based auditing: An industry case study / 2407.06232 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 6. Lessons learned from AstraZeneca’s 2021 AI audit
REFERENCES - Auditing of AI: Legal, Ethical and Technical Approaches / 2407.06235 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 2 The evolution of auditing as a governance mechanism
- Generative AI for Health Technology Assessment: Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy Considerations / 2407.11054 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.11054 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- Introduction
Appendices - Improving governance outcomes through AI documentation: Bridging theory and practice / 2409.08960 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.08960 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 3 Methods
- ValueCompass: A Framework of Fundamental Values for Human-AI Alignment / 2409.09586 / ISBN:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.09586 / Published by ArXiv / on (web) Publishing site
- 6 Discussion
References